1955 Plymouth Belvedere vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Plymouth Belvedere | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Plymouth | Rover |
Model | Belvedere | 75 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2760 mm |