1955 Plymouth Belvedere vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1955 Plymouth Belvedere.
Because 1955 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Plymouth Belvedere | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Belvedere | E-350 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2619 mm |