1955 Pontiac Star Chief vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 64 kg more than 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Pontiac Star Chief | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
Model | Star Chief | Tundra |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4715 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3270 mm |