1955 Pontiac Star Chief vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1955 Pontiac Star Chief is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Pontiac Star Chief. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Pontiac Star Chief | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
Model | Star Chief | Matrix |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4715 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2601 mm |