1955 Porsche 356 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ka weights approximately 325 kg more than 1955 Porsche 356.
Because 1955 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Porsche 356 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Porsche | Ford |
Model | 356 | Ka |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 35 L |