1955 Porsche 356 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 475 kg more than 1955 Porsche 356.
Because 1955 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Porsche 356 | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Porsche | Honda |
Model | 356 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 40 L |