1955 Porsche 356 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 967 kg more than 1955 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Porsche 356 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Porsche | Chevrolet |
Model | 356 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 319 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1697 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 72 L |