1955 Riley RM A vs. 1964 Toyota Sport 800
To start off, 1964 Toyota Sport 800 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 654 kg more than 1964 Toyota Sport 800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 1964 Toyota Sport 800 | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Sport 800 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 582 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2010 mm |