1955 Riley RM A vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1967 Pontiac Firebird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 424 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Riley RM A | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Riley | Pontiac |
| Model | RM A | Firebird |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2750 mm |
