1955 Riley RM A vs. 1967 Riley 4
To start off, 1967 Riley 4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 88 kg more than 1967 Riley 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 1967 Riley 4 | |
Make | Riley | Riley |
Model | RM A | 4 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |