1955 Riley RM A vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,522 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | RM A | C70 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2860 mm |