1955 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 66 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |