1955 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Audi A4
To start off, 2010 Audi A4 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A4 weights approximately 364 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Riley RM A | 2010 Audi A4 | |
| Make | Riley | Audi |
| Model | RM A | A4 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4704 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1826 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1427 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2809 mm |
