1955 Riley RM A vs. 2012 BMW 750
To start off, 2012 BMW 750 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 750 weights approximately 869 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW 750 has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW 750 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2012 BMW 750 | |
Make | Riley | BMW |
Model | RM A | 750 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5215 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1479 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3211 mm |