1955 Riley RM A vs. 2012 BMW M3
To start off, 2012 BMW M3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW M3 weights approximately 419 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2012 BMW M3 | |
Make | Riley | BMW |
Model | RM A | M3 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1424 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2761 mm |