1955 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2012 Ford Expedition is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2012 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Riley | Ford |
Model | RM A | Expedition |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 2651 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1974 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3327 mm |