1955 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1284 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Riley | Cadillac |
Model | RM A | SRX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2807 mm |