1955 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 26 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Riley RM A | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Riley | Mini |
Model | RM A | Cooper |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3729 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2467 mm |