1955 Rover P4 vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 420 (87 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1955 Rover P4. (79 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420 should accelerate faster than 1955 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Rover P4 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1998 Rover 420.
Because 1955 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Rover P4 (188 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 1955 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Rover P4 | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Rover | Rover |
Model | P4 | 420 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |