1955 Rover P4 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 51 kg more than 1955 Rover P4.
Because 1955 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Rover P4 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | P4 | C30 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 60 L |