1955 Saab 92 vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 120 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1955 Saab 92.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Saab 92 | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Saab | Volvo |
| Model | 92 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |
