1955 Saab 92 vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,524 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 614 kg more than 1955 Saab 92.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1955 Saab 92 has manual transmission. 1955 Saab 92 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Saab 92 | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Saab | Volvo |
| Model | 92 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 2524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2800 mm |
