1955 Saab 92 vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Saab 92 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 545 kg more than 1955 Saab 92.
Because 2009 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1955 Saab 92 has manual transmission. 1955 Saab 92 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Saab 92 | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Saab | Toyota |
Model | 92 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3710 mm |