1955 Singer Hunter vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Singer Hunter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Singer Hunter weights approximately 176 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Singer Hunter | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Singer | Smart |
| Model | Hunter | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2510 mm |
