1955 Singer Hunter vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1955 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1955 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: