1955 Singer Hunter vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 115 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Singer Hunter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Singer Hunter | 2010 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Singer | Chevrolet |
Model | Hunter | Colorado |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 3210 mm |