1955 Singer Hunter vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 904 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Singer Hunter | 2010 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Singer | Lexus |
| Model | Hunter | RX |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2741 mm |
