1955 Singer Hunter vs. 2013 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2013 Nissan Rogue is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Rogue (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 364 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Singer Hunter | 2013 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Singer | Nissan |
Model | Hunter | Rogue |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4655 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2690 mm |