1955 Studebaker Champion vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 155 kg more than 1955 Studebaker Champion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Studebaker Champion | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Studebaker | Ford |
Model | Champion | Falcon |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3032 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2630 mm |