1955 Studebaker Champion vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion.
Because 1955 Studebaker Champion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Studebaker Champion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Studebaker Champion | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Studebaker | Ford |
| Model | Champion | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3032 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2490 mm |
