1955 Talbot T 26 vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1955 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1955 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2012 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2012 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1955 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1955 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Talbot T 26 | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Talbot | Toyota |
| Model | T 26 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 4482 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
