1955 Triumph TR2 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1955 Triumph TR2. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1955 Triumph TR2.
Because 1955 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Triumph TR2 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | TR2 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2490 mm |