1955 Vauxhall Wyvern vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Vauxhall Wyvern. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Vauxhall Wyvern would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1955 Vauxhall Wyvern.

Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Vauxhall Wyvern. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Vauxhall Wyvern 2013 Jaguar XJ
Make Vauxhall Jaguar
Model Wyvern XJ
Year Released 1955 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1507 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Horse Power 0 HP 503 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 2370 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 5252 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 2105 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3157 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]