1956 Abarth 600 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1956 Abarth 600. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 Abarth 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Abarth 600. (54 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth 600 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 600 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
