1956 Abarth 750 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota ES 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota ES 3 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1956 Abarth 750.
Because 1956 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth 750 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 750 | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2320 mm |
