1956 Abarth 750 vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1956 Abarth 750. (47 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Abarth 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Abarth 750. (54 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Abarth 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth 750 | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 750 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 263 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |
