1956 Abarth 750 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1956 Abarth 750. (47 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 Abarth 750.
Because 1956 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Abarth 750. (54 Nm). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Abarth 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth 750 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 750 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
