1956 Abarth 750 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 1,149 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 425 kg more than 1956 Abarth 750.
Because 1956 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (105 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Abarth 750. (54 Nm). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Abarth 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth 750 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 750 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1149 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |
