1956 Abarth Renault vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Abarth Renault is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Abarth Renault (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Abarth Renault should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 50 kg more than 1956 Abarth Renault.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Abarth Renault | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | Renault | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 57 L |
