1956 Abarth Renault vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1956 Abarth Renault. (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1956 Abarth Renault. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 742 kg more than 1956 Abarth Renault. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Abarth Renault. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Abarth Renault | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | Renault | Condor |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |