1956 AC Ace vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1962 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Ace weights approximately 304 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | AC | Lotus |
Model | Ace | Elan |
Year Released | 1956 | 1962 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 138 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 45 L |