1956 AC Ace vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 316 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | AC | NSU |
| Model | Ace | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 37 L |
