1956 AC Ace vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Ace weights approximately 44 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | AC | Lotus |
Model | Ace | Elan |
Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 146 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 45 L |