1956 AC Ace vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 618 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Ace | Challenger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1969 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 422 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |