1956 AC Ace vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 287 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
| Make | AC | Austin |
| Model | Ace | 2200 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2227 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1181 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 56 L |
