1956 AC Ace vs. 1973 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1973 Lancia Beta is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Lancia Beta (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Lancia Beta weights approximately 204 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Lancia Beta. (144 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1973 Lancia Beta | |
Make | AC | Lancia |
Model | Ace | Beta |
Year Released | 1956 | 1973 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 51 L |