1956 AC Ace vs. 1976 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1976 Triumph Stag is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Stag weights approximately 316 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1976 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | AC | Triumph |
| Model | Ace | Stag |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 63 L |
