1956 AC Ace vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 9 weights approximately 21 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Ace | 9 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |
