1956 AC Ace vs. 1983 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1983 Seat Ronda is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1983 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Seat Ronda weights approximately 6 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Seat Ronda. (90 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1983 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | AC | Seat |
| Model | Ace | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2460 mm |
