1956 AC Ace vs. 1989 Buick Skylark
To start off, 1989 Buick Skylark is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skylark (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Skylark weights approximately 382 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Buick Skylark (251 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1989 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1989 Buick Skylark | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Ace | Skylark |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1276 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 62 L |
